2011 Accounts: Counting the cost of failure in 2010/11
In his response to our question via the Swindon Advertiser a few weeks ago, interim Chairman Jeremy Wray indicated the Club will hold their AGM towards the end of this month or at the start of May.
“We have an AGM coming up soon and that [appointing Wray as Chairman] will be sorted out then. Hopefully, if all goes well, we will be able to drop the interim part of it. The meeting will come either at the end of this month or at the start of May. It is not happening until then because of the organisation of some administrative processes, but we are sure we will hit all of the deadlines that we need to.”
The AGM is set to be held much later than recent seasons, however we’ve obtained a copy of the Annual Report and Financial Statement for the year ending 31st May 2011; which has been on public record since the 6th March 2012.
At the forthcoming AGM, Wray will announce Swindon Town Football Company Limited made a loss of £1,331,946 for the financial year. This comes after Town made their first profit in years in 2010, leading Andrew Fitton to proclaim the £415,791 profit made Swindon “probably the only profitable club in League One”, albeit there were several strings attached to his statement.
The 2011 accounts paint a troubling picture of the real cost of failure to beat Millwall at Wembley back in May 2010. Town continued the 2010/11 season full of hope with a similar playing budget – totalling £4,375,964 – and speculated further by acquiring the registration of players; including money buys Simon Ferry, Paul Caddis, Matt Ritchie, Milan Misun, Elliot Benyon and Aden Flint for £740,002.
Whether these purchases were identified and demanded by then manager Danny Wilson are now in doubt. Former chairman Andrew Fitton’s frank admission during the Gillingham commentary for BBC Wiltshire confirmed Caddis and Ferry arrived without the full consent of the manager. Fitton’s good eye for a player is evident – as seen by his decision to seek out Charlie Austin – and you can’t complain these two purchases haven’t served the Club well.
Because of the budget and outlay, improving upon the successes of the year before was not only a priority for the fans, but essential for restoring the club’s finances from years of deficit.
Without everything positive that 2010 brought including; bumper County Ground crowds against the likes of Leeds, Norwich and Southampton; a healthy receipt from an FA Cup Third Round trip to Fulham; and a trip to Wembley, Town’s admission charges and other match day revenue fell by 29% to £2,294,301. While this was offset by a marginal increase in receipts from the Football League, sponsorship and advertising, overall turnover decreased by 13% to £4,634,288. The toughening financial climate is also reflected in the 6% decline in revenue from other commercial activities, which is a vital income stream to grow to support the footballing side of the business; particularly as part of any stadium redevelopment.
Another financial burden in 2011 were some extraordinary redundancy costs as Town parted company with staff including Danny Wilson, Peter Shirtliff, George Wood, Paul Hart and Ian McPartland. The redundancy costs amounted to a staggering £263,982 and ultimately not worthwhile as we plunged to our fifth worst points tally in the League.
The total loss for the financial year would’ve been greater without player sales to compensate. The transfers to new pastures of Gordon Greer, Sean Morrison, Charlie Austin and David Prutton generated a net receipt of £1,664,815, without which Swindon would’ve been facing an operating loss of around £2,97m.
While supporters praised Andrew Fitton’s reign as chairman, many heavily criticised him for letting key players leave the Club. With the exception of Greer – which was undoubtably a mistake and a point I believe Fitton has himself acknowledged – the sales of Morrison and Austin were shrewd pieces of business and ultimately vital to counter the losses on a dire season.
With losses of £1,331,946 for the financial year, the continual backing of the directors and investors remains paramount and welcomed to sustain the business going forward. However, this year’s loss is one of many over the past decade, a further addition to an already bloated balance sheet with borrowings from the parent holding company and directors steadily increasing since the Consortium took control.
The Club has total liabilities of approximately £10.7m, which is up from around £8.8m in 2008, meaning Town is clearly not ‘debt free’ as some supporters believe. However, these vital borrowings from supportive directors do ensure that liquidity exists in years of operating losses to provide sufficient fund to satisfy HMRC and trade creditors; ensuring Town hopefully won’t be entering Administration anytime soon.
After Town suffered a difficult trading year in 2011, what might the picture be for 2012?
The arrival of Paolo Di Canio has secured the essential promotion at the first attempt. The Board’s backing of Di Canio has been impressive to say the least, allowing the manager to build one squad and then slowly dismantle it as the year developed with a raft of new permanent and loan signings. These accounts reveal the signing of 19 players and the release / sale of 7 have come at the net cost of £506,011; a hefty sum by League One, let alone League Two standards. Whether this means we should expect player sales – such as Ritchie – over the summer to add some balance to the books, only time will tell.
A year from now it will be interesting to understand how our wage budget for this League Two campaign compares to previous years. Also, how much further financial assistance – as has been reported – the directors have resorted to lend / gift the club to fund Di Canio’s addiction to a large squad rotation and get around the League Two salary cap rules.
We already know the season ticket prices have sharply risen as the Club tries to ensure parity with our competitors in League One. Our analysis concluded they are largely a price worth paying, providing the Club with the extra income it sorely needs in the short term, but any increase is ultimately worthwhile if strong performances continue on the pitch.
The accounts also reveal the importance of the stadium redevelopment to diversify and substantially increase non-matchday income streams. Without these revenues – which so many clubs have gained in recent years – our ambitions to become a stable club in the Championship will be curtailed and well beyond our financial limit.
What is certain is immediate success back in League One remains critical to our finances. There’s no doubt Paolo Di Canio will rebuild the squad for the umpteenth time with the hopeful financial backing of the board, but all this spending adds to the existing deficit. So when you demand Town chase player ‘x’ or ‘y’ and spend significant sums, please remember it all has to be paid back one day in one shape or form…
Image from Flickr by ‘Images_of_Money’ licensed under Creative Commons
That’s a cracking article, thoughtful, informative and a very shrewd piece of analysis, thank you.
LikeLike
Thank you for sharing this Mr Washbag, superb stuff. Perhaps there aren’t that many surprises – club takes hit on bad season. Still it will panic a few just looking at the numbers…
Perhaps the interesting part is in why the AGM hasn’t happened yet? More changes on the board expected? Perhaps the much talked about director with property experience be joining?
LikeLike
I didn’t cover the speculation on why the AGM has been delayed. I suspect your suggestions of the board changes and new investor are likely causes.
LikeLike
Interesting to see that we arent debt free at all something many fans believe we are/were! Also its disaapointing to see that austin went so cheaply i would have thought 1.6mill would have been enough on his own! Not sure if my maths adds up but you say that £506,000 is a hefty cost for 19 new players this season but we spent £740,000 on 7 players the season before so id disagree with hefty for this season!.
LikeLike
As usual Washbag has quality. However, I’m concerned with the figures but it does need to be explained to the fans – well done Washbag. Promotion/Championship & ground development are the only way we will survive & grow. Looking at the figures you can see that it would have been a disaster for all if we hadn’t bounced!
LikeLike
A great article and very interesting reading.
I too will be very interested to learn what our wage bill is for this season. I have heard the figure of £3.5m mentioned and this compares with Torquay’s of £0.9m leading some to say ‘who has done better this year, Di Canio or Martin Ling?’. Time will tell!
LikeLike
We sold /released 16 players from the squad of 2010/2011 which includes Timlin.
LikeLike
Pingback: Have Swindon missed a trick after Preston signed Lee Holmes? – The Washbag
Pingback: Cash converters: Where Swindon’s new money will be spent? – The Washbag
Pingback: Why administration is unlikely but the exit of Swindon’s backer Andrew Black is certain – The Washbag
Pingback: Swindon Post £1.3million Loss - Bulls News